groundcover vs KubeSense
| groundcover | KubeSense | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $30/mo | $20/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted, Web | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Paid from | 30 /mo | 20 /mo |
| Deployment model | hybrid | self-hosted |
| Kubernetes support | — | Yes |
| Network visibility | — | Yes |
| Application tracing | — | Yes |
| Kernel profiling | — | No |
| Supported operating systems | — | Linux; CentOS 7.3+; Debian 10+; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8+; Ubuntu 16.04+ |
Both are listed in Best eBPF Observability Tools. On Inferse, KubeSense scores higher on our published basis.