groundcover vs orb8
| groundcover | orb8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $30/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted, Web | Linux, macOS |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 30 /mo | — |
| Deployment model | hybrid | self-hosted |
| Kubernetes support | — | Yes |
| Network visibility | — | Yes |
| Application tracing | — | No |
| Kernel profiling | — | No |
| Supported operating systems | — | Linux; macOS development via Lima and QEMU |
Both are listed in Best eBPF Observability Tools. On Inferse, groundcover scores higher on our published basis.