Hound vs QuickDup
| Hound | QuickDup | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Clone detection method | — | hybrid |
| Scan scope | — | repository |
| CI integration | — | Yes |
| IDE integration | — | No |
| Self-hosted option | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Code Clone Detection Tools. On Inferse, Hound scores higher on our published basis.