Infection Monkey vs OpenAEV
| Infection Monkey | OpenAEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Attack simulation modes | agent-based | hybrid |
| Included attack surfaces | local networks; internal servers; on-premises data centers; cloud-based data centers; open services | endpoints, asset groups, people, teams, network hosts, email, phishing landing pages, SMS, phone-based social engineering, media pressure, tabletop exercises |
| Custom attack scenarios | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | hybrid | hybrid |
| MITRE ATT&CK mapping | — | Yes |
| Continuous scheduling | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Breach and Attack Simulation Software. On Inferse, OpenAEV scores higher on our published basis.