IronMQ vs NATS
| IronMQ | NATS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $399/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | api, Linux, self-hosted |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Paid from | 399 /mo | — |
| Deployment model | hybrid | hybrid |
| Dead-letter queues | Yes | — |
| Ordering guarantees | per_queue | — |
| Supported protocols | HTTP/REST, Amazon SQS, OpenStack Marconi | NATS, MQTT, WebSocket |
| Delivery guarantees | — | configurable |
Both are listed in Best Message Broker Software. On Inferse, IronMQ scores higher on our published basis.