Overview

Kvasir reports a corpus spanning nine jurisdictions, with more than 450,000 norms and more than 450,000 court decisions, refreshed daily. That gives research and grounding workflows a broad base of primary materials, including case law, statutes, and regulations. Kvasir supports authority search and source citations, but not case analysis; teams that need a tool to analyze a case rather than find and verify authorities should look elsewhere.

The app serves direct research, while REST and MCP access lets developers connect the service to software and assistants. Kvasir documents MCP integrations for ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Perplexity, and Mistral Le Chat, plus setup for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, and VS Code. Plain REST access is also available. The provider, kvasir.legal GbR, is based in Bremen, Germany.

Key features

Search and citation resolution: Legal search, legal objects, citation relations, and source citations support finding authorities and following citation connections. These tools are useful for retrieval and reference work, not a substitute for case analysis.
Batch verification: The API can check whether citations exist, including in batches. This is a better fit for checking a collection of references than relying on individual lookups.
Draft quotation checks: The API compares draft quotations against canonical legal wording, helping teams identify discrepancies. Full draft text is transmitted only through check_draft, which requires the separately granted legal.check scope; that permission boundary should be part of any workflow and access-control review.
Developer access: MCP support across named assistants and coding environments, alongside REST, gives teams several ways to integrate legal grounding. The keyless sandbox allows 20 requests per day; the MCP demo is limited to 10 tool calls per day and IP, so it is useful for initial evaluation rather than sustained use.
Privacy and security: Kvasir says request content is processed in memory and not stored, while aggregate usage counters are retained. Its corpus, account records, and usage counters are hosted in Railway's EU region. It does not currently hold SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certification; teams that require either certification should account for that before adopting it. A CAIQ-Lite questionnaire is offered on request.

Pricing

Kvasir is freemium. Hobby costs 0.00 EUR per free, billed Free forever, and includes the full app, an API key, MCP, and 2,000 sips per month. That is a substantive starting tier for individual exploration or a small workflow, though its monthly quota sets a clear ceiling.

Pro costs 12.00 EUR per month, billed €12/mo, and includes 5,000 sips per month. Overflow is billed per sip, with a spend limit on by default. Pro is aimed at users who need more monthly capacity, but it is coming with billing and is not yet available, so it is not an option for teams needing a paid tier now.

Enterprise has custom pricing, with negotiated firm-wide volume, a DPA, invoicing, agreed terms, and priority for coverage and endpoint requests. It is the relevant route for organizations that need volume and negotiated terms rather than a self-serve quota.

Default API key limits are 120 requests per minute and 50,000 per month. The per-month sip quota and API request limits are distinct constraints to consider when sizing a workflow. The Impressum says the company generally responds by email or LinkedIn on working days within one hour.

Platforms

Kvasir is available on web and through an API. REST and MCP access make it relevant to teams integrating legal search into existing software, while the app supports direct use. The global jurisdiction scope label should not be mistaken for universal corpus coverage: the described research product focuses on German, Austrian, Swiss, and EU law.

Who it's for

Kvasir is a good fit for legal practitioners who need to locate primary authorities and verify citations, and for developers building retrieval or quotation-checking steps into AI-assisted legal workflows. Its daily refreshes and citation-focused functions support current source work; its lack of case analysis makes it a weaker choice for teams seeking interpretive case summaries. Organizations with strict certification requirements should weigh its current security posture before selection.

Pros and cons

Pro: The reported scale and daily refreshes provide broad, current coverage for research across nine jurisdictions.
Pro: Full app, API key, and MCP access on the free Hobby plan enable meaningful evaluation without an initial fee.
Pro: REST and documented MCP integrations support both custom software and named assistant and coding-tool workflows.
Con: Case analysis is not supported, limiting its value for work that needs more than retrieval and citation checks.
Con: Draft checking requires a separate legal.check scope, so teams must deliberately grant and govern access to full draft text.
Con: Pro is not yet available, and Hobby's 2,000-sip monthly allowance may constrain ongoing use.
Con: Kvasir does not currently hold SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certification, which may disqualify it for some procurement requirements.

Alternatives

CaseRead is another freemium web and API option; its free plan includes research messages, citation checks, document analysis, projects, storage, and one user, making it worth considering when those free-tier activities match the workflow.

Legalcode offers a free tier with daily and monthly request caps, non-patent sources across 40 jurisdictions, and detailed concise results. Consider it when that stated source scope and query format better fit the need.

eulaw.ai is a paid web and API service with a free trial and a €39.00 EUR per month Full access plan, excl. VAT and per user, with unlimited prompts and cancellation anytime. It is an option for readers who prefer that stated paid-plan structure.

Midpage is a paid web and API alternative with a free trial; consider it when its manual and agentic research tools, AI citator, and plugins are the better fit.

Clauselex offers a free web plan with capped research, drafts, uploads, matters, and history. It may suit users whose work fits those stated free-plan limits.

Curia is a freemium web option with a five-credit free tier and a 39.00 CAD per month Starter plan that includes cited case research, document analysis, and memos. Consider it when those functions are a closer match.

Align Research is a freemium web alternative with three research jobs per month on its free plan; it is a possible fit for low-volume research use.

CaseCraft offers web and mobile access with one-time credit packs as well as paid plans; consider it when that credit-based purchasing model fits better.

Browse AI Legal Research Software for more options.

Verdict

Choose Kvasir if your work centers on German, Austrian, Swiss, or EU legal research, source-backed retrieval, or citation checks that need to connect to an app or developer workflow. Its broad, refreshed corpus and free API/MCP access are the strongest reasons to start there. Look elsewhere if you need case analysis, a paid Pro plan immediately, or current SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certification.

	Kvasir	Picard.law
Free plan	Yes	No
Free trial	No	No
Paid from	€12/mo	—
Open source	No	No
Platforms	api, Web	Web
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Authority search	Yes	—
Case analysis	No	—
Source citations	Yes	Yes
Primary-source coverage	case law, statutes, regulations	—
Jurisdiction scope	global	—
Document uploads	—	Yes

Kvasir vs Picard.law

Kvasir

Picard.law