LanceDB vs turbopuffer
| LanceDB | turbopuffer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted | Web |
| Deployment | both | both |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | No | Yes |
| Index types | IVF_RQ, IVF_PQ, IVF_HNSW_SQ, IVF_HNSW_FLAT, HNSW | SPFresh |
| SDK languages | Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Rust | Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, Ruby, C#/.NET |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 16 /mo |
| Maximum dimensions | — | 10,752 dimensions |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting, Best Search Databases. On Inferse, LanceDB scores higher on our published basis.