LangSmith vs Pydantic Evals
| LangSmith | Pydantic Evals | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | $39/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Evaluation methods | — | Deterministic checks; custom evaluators; LLM judges; G-Eval; performance checks; report evaluators; span-based evaluation; agentic trajectory evaluation |
| Model support | — | OpenAI; Anthropic; Gemini; xAI; Bedrock; Cerebras; Cohere; Groq; Hugging Face; Mistral; OpenRouter; and other listed Pydantic AI providers |
| Safety evaluations | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | self-hosted |
| Prompt versioning | — | Yes |
| API access | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best AI LLM Evaluation Tools. On Inferse, LangSmith scores higher on our published basis.