Liqo vs Spiderpool
| Liqo | Spiderpool | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | api, Linux, self-hosted |
| Multi-cluster networking | Yes | Yes |
| Encryption in transit | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Kubernetes; Kubeadm; K3s; K0s; AKS; EKS; GKE; Aruba Cloud KaaS; OpenShift | Kubernetes; bare metal; virtual machines; public clouds; AMD64; ARM64 |
| CNI plugin | — | Yes |
| Network policies | — | Yes |
| Egress control | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Container Networking Software. On Inferse, Spiderpool scores higher on our published basis.