LiveEnsure vs Verilock
| LiveEnsure | Verilock | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Android, api, iOS |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | cloud | — |
| Supported factors | mobile device, location, geofence, time, knowledge, biometrics, behavior, gestures, Bluetooth devices, QR scan, tap, challenge/OTP | TOTP-based 2FA; push/tap approval; rotating one-time authentication token |
| App integration methods | REST/API integration, iOS library, Android library, QR scan, app-to-app handoff | QR code; user authentication key; third-party TOTP compatibility; API-ready integration |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | — |
| Device trust controls | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Inferse, Verilock scores higher on our published basis.