LizardFS vs NetApp ONTAP Select
| LizardFS | NetApp ONTAP Select | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | — |
| Deployment model | on-premises | on-premises |
| Storage protocols | NFS 3.x, NFS 4.0, pNFS | NFS, SMB/CIFS, iSCSI, NVMe over TCP, S3 |
| Replication | Yes | Yes |
| Erasure coding | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Maximum nodes | — | 12 |
| Kubernetes support | — | Yes |
| S3-compatible access | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software-Defined Storage Software. On Inferse, NetApp ONTAP Select scores higher on our published basis.