LucidLink vs Tiger Bridge
| LucidLink | Tiger Bridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | $7/mo | $0.01/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, extension, iOS, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows | Windows |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment model | cloud | hybrid |
| Global namespace | Yes | Yes |
| Local caching | Yes | Yes |
| Supported protocols | S3-compatible object storage | SMB/CIFS, NFS, S3-compatible object storage |
| Cloud storage targets | AWS S3, AWS GovCloud, Microsoft Azure, Backblaze, Cloudian, Dell, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud, Zadara, Nutanix Objects, Scality, Telefonica, Oracle Cloud, Wasabi, Alibaba Cloud | Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, Huawei Cloud, Backblaze B2, Google Drive, LYVE Cloud, Wasabi, S3-compatible object storage |
| Edge synchronization | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 0.006 /mo |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Storage Gateway Software. On Inferse, Tiger Bridge scores higher on our published basis.