LucidLink vs Triofox
| LucidLink | Triofox | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | $7/mo | $11/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, extension, iOS, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows | Android, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment model | cloud | hybrid |
| Global namespace | Yes | Yes |
| Local caching | Yes | Yes |
| Supported protocols | S3-compatible object storage | CIFS/SMB, HTTPS |
| Cloud storage targets | AWS S3, AWS GovCloud, Microsoft Azure, Backblaze, Cloudian, Dell, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud, Zadara, Nutanix Objects, Scality, Telefonica, Oracle Cloud, Wasabi, Alibaba Cloud | Amazon S3, S3-compatible storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, OpenStack, Wasabi, Microsoft SharePoint, WebDAV, Rackspace CloudFiles, Internap XipCloud |
| Edge synchronization | No | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Storage Gateway Software. On Inferse, Triofox scores higher on our published basis.