Lura vs Ocelot
| Lura | Ocelot | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | — | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment model | self-hosted | self-hosted |
| Supported protocols | HTTP(S); other transport adapters can be added, including Thrift, gRPC, AMQP and NATS | HTTP, HTTPS, WebSocket, WebSocket Secure (WSS) |
| Request transformation | Yes | Yes |
| Authentication methods | — | JWT bearer tokens, IdentityServer bearer tokens, ASP.NET Core authentication schemes |
| Rate limiting | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best API Gateway Software. On Inferse, Ocelot scores higher on our published basis.