medRxiv vs Project MUSE
| medRxiv | Project MUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Full-text access | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced search | Yes | Yes |
| Subject coverage | medical | multidisciplinary |
| Content types | preprints, research articles, meta-analyses, clinical research design protocols | scholarly journals, scholarly books, book chapters, journal articles, abstracts and summaries, critical editions, reference works, primary source material |
| Theses and dissertations | No | — |
| Institutional access | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Academic Research Databases. On Inferse, medRxiv scores higher on our published basis.