Mend SCA vs ZeroPath
| Mend SCA | ZeroPath | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | $83.33/mo | $1,000/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Supported ecosystems | C/C++/Conan, C#/.NET/NuGet, Go, Java/Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm/yarn/pnpm, PHP/Composer, Python/pip/Poetry/Conda/uv, Ruby/Bundler, Scala/sbt, Swift/SwiftPM/CocoaPods, Rust/Cargo, Haskell/Cabal, Elixir/Erlang/Hex, Bazel, OCaml | — |
| SBOM generation | Yes | — |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | — |
| Paid from | — | 60 /user/mo |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Inferse, Mend SCA scores higher on our published basis.