Microsoft Desired State Configuration vs Quattor
Microsoft Desired State Configuration
5.1 #23 in Configuration Management Tools
About Microsoft Desired State Configuration| Microsoft Desired State Configuration | Quattor | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Linux, self-hosted |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Drift detection | Yes | — |
| Patch management | Yes | Yes |
| Policy as code | Yes | Yes |
| Compliance reporting | Yes | — |
| Supported platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Enterprise Linux (EL), including Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Agent model | — | agent_based |
Both are listed in Best Configuration Management Tools. On Inferse, Quattor scores higher on our published basis.