MuJava vs PIT
| MuJava | PIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported languages | Java | Java and JVM bytecode |
| Test frameworks | JUnit | JUnit 3, JUnit 4, TestNG; JUnit 5 via plugin |
| Mutation operators | Class-level: AMC, IHD, IHI, IOD, IOP, IOR, ISI, ISD, IPC, PNC, PMD, PPD, PCI, PCC, PCD, PRV, OMR, OMD, OAC, JTI, JTD, JSI, JSD, JID, JDC, EOA, EOC, EAM, EMM. Method-level: AOR, AOI, AOD, ROR, COR, COI, COD, SOR, LOR, LOI, LOD, ASR, SDL, VDL, CDL, ODL. | Conditionals Boundary, Increments, Invert Negatives, Math, Negate Conditionals, Void Method Calls, Empty Returns, False Returns, True Returns, Null Returns, Primitive Returns, Remove Conditionals, Inline Constant, Constructor Calls, Non-Void Method Calls, Remove Increments, Argument Propagation, Big Integer, Member Variable, Naked Receiver, Negation, Arithmetic Operator Replacement, Arithmetic Ope |
| Incremental analysis | — | Yes |
| Parallel execution | — | Yes |
| Surviving mutant reports | — | Yes |
| Mutation quality gate | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Mutation Testing Tools. On Inferse, PIT scores higher on our published basis.