NanoMQ vs Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer
Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer
5.5 #32 in Message Broker Software
About Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer| NanoMQ | Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer | |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Delivery guarantees | configurable | |
| Supported protocols | MQTT, ZeroMQ, nanomsg, NNG, WebSocket, SOME/IP, DDS, MQTT over QUIC | Core Protocol, AMQP 1.0, MQTT, OpenWire, STOMP, JMS 2.0 |
| Free plan | No | |
| Dead-letter queues | Yes | |
| Supported targets | container images, binaries, documents, source-code commits, software bills of materials, build artifacts, AI/ML models | |
| Certificate provided | Yes | |
| Trusted timestamping | Yes | |
| CI/CD signing | Yes | |
| Image scanning | Yes | |
| Posture management | Yes | |
| Runtime protection | Yes | |
| Admission control | Yes | |
| Identity security | Yes | |
| Managed Kubernetes | broad |
Listed together in Best Message Broker Software