NetApp Global File Cache vs Triofox
| NetApp Global File Cache | Triofox | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | $20.83/mo | $11/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted, Windows | Android, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment model | virtual | hybrid |
| Global namespace | Yes | Yes |
| Local caching | Yes | Yes |
| Supported protocols | SMB/CIFS | CIFS/SMB, HTTPS |
| Cloud storage targets | Azure NetApp Files; Cloud Volumes ONTAP; Cloud Volume Services | Amazon S3, S3-compatible storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, OpenStack, Wasabi, Microsoft SharePoint, WebDAV, Rackspace CloudFiles, Internap XipCloud |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Edge synchronization | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Storage Gateway Software. On Inferse, NetApp Global File Cache scores higher on our published basis.