Oobeya vs QAI
| Oobeya | QAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 29 /mo |
| Supported frameworks | — | Playwright, Selenium Java with JUnit 5, Selenium Java with TestNG, Selenium Python with pytest, WebdriverIO with Mocha, Jest, Vitest, pytest, Maven/JUnit 4/5, Go with gotestsum, NUnit, RSpec |
| CI/CD integrations | — | GitHub Actions |
| Flaky-test detection | — | Yes |
| Failure analysis | — | Yes |
| Execution trend reports | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Analytics Software. On Inferse, Oobeya scores higher on our published basis.