OpenText NetIQ Advanced Authentication vs Verilock
OpenText NetIQ Advanced Authentication
6.2 #39 in Authenticator apps
About OpenText NetIQ Advanced Authentication| OpenText NetIQ Advanced Authentication | Verilock | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | — | Android, api, iOS |
| Deployment | hybrid | — |
| Supported factors | password, one-time password, biometrics, FIDO2, FIDO U2F, smart cards, PKI, smartphone, SMS OTP, email OTP, security questions, device authentication, voice, facial recognition, fingerprint, geo-fencing, out-of-band authentication | TOTP-based 2FA; push/tap approval; rotating one-time authentication token |
| App integration methods | RADIUS, SAML, OIDC/OAuth2, ADFS, Kerberos, REST, Mobile APIs, com APIs, native Microsoft plug-ins | QR code; user authentication key; third-party TOTP compatibility; API-ready integration |
| Adaptive access policies | Yes | — |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Inferse, Verilock scores higher on our published basis.