OpenText Server Automation vs Quattor
| OpenText Server Automation | Quattor | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows | Linux, self-hosted |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Agent model | both | agent_based |
| Drift detection | Yes | — |
| Patch management | Yes | Yes |
| Policy as code | Yes | Yes |
| Compliance reporting | Yes | — |
| Supported platforms | Windows Server, Windows, Linux, UNIX, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Ubuntu, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, Debian, Oracle Linux, VMware ESXi | Enterprise Linux (EL), including Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Configuration Management Tools. On Inferse, Quattor scores higher on our published basis.