Pinecone vs turbopuffer
| Pinecone | turbopuffer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Web | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Paid from | 20 /mo | 16 /mo |
| Deployment | cloud | both |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | Yes | Yes |
| Index types | Ananas, PQFS, IVF with PQFS | SPFresh |
| SDK languages | Python, JavaScript, Java, Go, C# | Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, Ruby, C#/.NET |
| Maximum dimensions | — | 10,752 dimensions |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting, Best Search Databases. On Inferse, Pinecone scores higher on our published basis.