Pixi vs Swift Package Manager
| Pixi | Swift Package Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | €42/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Lockfile support | Yes | Yes |
| Package formats | — | source packages, system libraries, binary targets, package registry archives |
| Supported platforms | — | macOS, Linux, Windows; packages can target Apple platforms |
| Dependency resolution | — | Yes |
| Private registry auth | — | Yes |
| Offline installation | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Package Managers. On Inferse, Pixi scores higher on our published basis.