QAI vs TestDino
| QAI | TestDino | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $49/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 29 /mo | 49 /mo |
| Supported frameworks | Playwright, Selenium Java with JUnit 5, Selenium Java with TestNG, Selenium Python with pytest, WebdriverIO with Mocha, Jest, Vitest, pytest, Maven/JUnit 4/5, Go with gotestsum, NUnit, RSpec | Playwright |
| CI/CD integrations | GitHub Actions | GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps, TeamCity, CircleCI |
| Flaky-test detection | Yes | Yes |
| Failure analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Execution trend reports | Yes | Yes |
| Data retention | — | 90 days |
| Self-hosted deployment | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Analytics Software. On Inferse, TestDino scores higher on our published basis.