Overview

REGREP maps regulated-firm data to the relevant framework, validates the output against its schema or taxonomy, and generates a filing-ready return. Its coverage spans 57 jurisdictions, including 51 EBA reports and more than 40 tax jurisdictions, as well as COREP/FINREP, IFR/IFPR, DORA, CRS/FATCA, CESOP, MiCA, EMIR/MiFIR and ISO 20022/SEPA. That breadth makes it a credible option for firms managing obligations across regimes; the specific module, output and filing cadence still determine whether a plan fits.

Users can register, activate a module, upload a file or connect a system, and generate a validated return without an implementation project. REGREP does not submit filings to regulators, so teams need a separate process for delivery to the relevant supervisor.

Key features

Schema-level validation: Each output is checked against the relevant schema or taxonomy before it leaves the platform. This can catch structural and taxonomy errors, but does not establish the accuracy of the source data.
Framework-dependent formats: Outputs include XBRL, XBRL-CSV, iXBRL, XML, JSON, PSV and CSV, depending on the framework. That gives teams options for downstream filing workflows without implying that every format is available for every regime.
Self-serve and integration paths: Self-serve plans support file upload and API access; enterprise Solution Layers offer full system integration by scope. Firms can start without an implementation project, while more complex integrations require a Solution Layers mandate.
Security and residency: Regulatory filing data is held in the EU. REGREP says it uses encryption in transit and at rest, administrator MFA, least-privilege roles, a Cloudflare WAF, rate limiting and login-attempt protection. Its GDPR programme is operational, while ISO 27001 and SOC 2 remain in progress and are not yet certified—a material consideration for buyers with formal assurance requirements.
Support and credits: Platform support is free. Expert filing review, guided onboarding and dedicated enterprise support are available through credits or Solution Layers mandates. Credits cost €1 each, with a minimum 50-credit pack for €50; they work across modules and expire 24 months after purchase.

Pricing

REGREP uses a freemium model, with paid plans from €500/yr. Each subscription covers one regulated entity; multi-entity, group and consolidated structures require Solution Layers mandates. Check the limits against reporting volume and cadence before committing, since the lower-priced modules are narrowly scoped.

TIN Validator: 0.01 EUR per once, billed in 100-record blocks; includes bulk processing and API access across 111 countries. The block billing matters for small batches, while the per-use model suits teams validating tax identifiers without an annual module.
FATCA: 500.00 EUR per year, with annual filing and one correction for one entity. A focused entry point for a single-entity FATCA obligation, not a broad reporting bundle.
EBA Single report Pro: 600.00 EUR per year for one entity, with runs by cadence (5 / 3 / 2). It is the lower-cost EBA option when one report is enough; it does not offer the all-report scope of the larger package.
CRS / DAC2: 1000.00 EUR per year for one jurisdiction, up to 10k records per year, filing and one correction, for one entity. Firms exceeding either the jurisdiction or record cap need a different arrangement.
DORA Register of Information: 1000.00 EUR per year for one entity and up to 50 ICT arrangements, with annual submission and updates. This is bounded coverage for firms whose register fits that cap.
EBA Any 3 reports Pro: 1500.00 EUR per year for one entity, with per-report cadence. It adds report choice over the single-report tier, while keeping the scope to three reports.
IFR/IFPR Pillar 2 ICARA: 2000.00 EUR per year, annual filing and one revision. The annual cycle and single revision suit a contained ICARA workflow.
EBA All 51 reports Pro: 4000.00 EUR per year for one entity, with unlimited runs subject to fair use. It is the broadest stated EBA option, but the fair-use term still applies.
IFR/IFPR Pillar 1 Class 3: 6000.00 EUR per year for Class 3, with continuous monitoring, quarterly returns and five runs.
IFR/IFPR Pillar 1 Class 2: 12000.00 EUR per year for Class 2, with continuous monitoring, quarterly returns and five runs. The higher price corresponds to Class 2 scope; both Pillar 1 plans cap runs at five.

Free platform support is distinct from paid expert services. Credits are an additional cost for those services, and their 24-month expiry makes unused balances a consideration for occasional users.

Platforms

REGREP is available as a cloud platform through web and API. The API enables system connection on self-serve plans, but firms requiring full integration should assess the scope of a Solution Layers mandate.

Who it's for

REGREP fits regulated firms filing across EU, UK or global frameworks, especially those seeking a self-serve workflow and validated, machine-readable returns for one entity. Its broad framework range can serve teams with several reporting obligations, provided each required module’s cadence and caps match their needs. It is less suitable for group or consolidated reporting without a Solution Layers mandate, firms that need the platform itself to submit returns, or buyers whose procurement requires current ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certification.

Pros and cons

Pro: Coverage across 57 jurisdictions and a wide set of frameworks can support varied reporting needs within one platform.
Pro: Schema or taxonomy validation plus file upload and API access gives teams a direct route to validated outputs without an implementation project.
Pro: EU data residency and stated encryption, MFA and access controls address important operational safeguards.
Con: Every subscription is limited to one regulated entity; groups need separately scoped Solution Layers mandates.
Con: Regulator submission is not included, leaving the final filing step to the firm.
Con: ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are not yet certified, which may rule it out for assurance-led procurement.
Con: Several plans have specific record, arrangement, cadence or run limits, so price alone does not show whether a module covers the workload.

Alternatives

For a broader comparison, see Regulatory Reporting Software.

Altova Regulatory Solutions is worth comparing when a free trial or self-hosted and Windows platforms matter; its CbC Reporting App subscription is 999.00 USD per year per user.
Arelle is the free, open-source XBRL option for teams that prefer desktop builds, a Python package, Docker or community plugins over REGREP’s priced filing modules.
Semansys Compliance Platform uses a custom proposal based on capabilities, jurisdictions, volume, deployment and commercial model, making it an alternative when those variables need a tailored proposal.
FIS Data Integrity Manager is another paid, web-based option.
Reg360 is a paid web-based alternative with pricing available upon request.
REGnosys is a freemium web-based alternative.
Complyfirst Regulatory Reporting is a paid web option whose custom proposal may account for licence restrictions, fair data-usage limits and separately priced premium features.
LSEG Corporate Treasury Risk is a paid web-based alternative with pricing available by contacting sales.

Verdict

Choose REGREP if a single regulated entity needs broad framework coverage, schema-validated outputs and a self-serve upload or API workflow. Its main advantage is combining that breadth with module-level filing workflows; look elsewhere if you need regulator submission, group-wide subscriptions, or certified ISO 27001 or SOC 2 assurance.

	reglity	REGREP
Free plan	No	No
Free trial	No	No
Paid from	—	€41.67/mo
Open source	No	No
Platforms	Web	api, Web
XBRL support	Yes	Yes
Validation rules	Yes	Yes
Audit trail	Yes	Yes
Deployment	hybrid	cloud
Free plan	—	Yes
Regulator submission	—	No
API access	—	Yes
Supported jurisdictions	—	57

reglity vs REGREP

reglity

REGREP