SBOM Observer vs ZeroPath
| SBOM Observer | ZeroPath | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $1,000/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Supported ecosystems | C/C++/Conan; Dart/Pub; Elixir/Hex; Erlang/Hex; Go; Java/Maven; .NET/NuGet; Node.js/npm; PHP/Composer; Python/PyPI/Pip; Ruby/RubyGems; Rust/Cargo; Swift/CocoaPods | — |
| SBOM generation | Yes | — |
| Monitored projects | 2 projects | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | — |
| Paid from | — | 60 /user/mo |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Inferse, ZeroPath scores higher on our published basis.