SenseCrypt vs TypingDNA ActiveLock
| SenseCrypt | TypingDNA ActiveLock | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $1/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, self-hosted, Web | Windows, macOS |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Paid from | 1 /user/mo | — |
| Biometric methods | facial recognition; liveness detection | typing behavior; mouse movement; face biometrics |
| Deployment model | hybrid | self-hosted |
| Supported platforms | web; Android; iOS; API; self-hosted infrastructure | Windows 10+; macOS 11+ |
| SDK languages | JavaScript/TypeScript; Python | — |
| Audit logs | Yes | Yes |
| Included users | 20 users | — |
Both are listed in Best Biometric Authentication Software. On Inferse, SenseCrypt scores higher on our published basis.