Spriv Adaptive MFA vs Verilock
| Spriv Adaptive MFA | Verilock | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $7/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Android, api, iOS |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Paid from | 7 /user/mo | — |
| Deployment | hybrid | — |
| Supported factors | Adaptive MFA, one-way SMS, two-way SMS, TOTP, Allow/Deny | TOTP-based 2FA; push/tap approval; rotating one-time authentication token |
| App integration methods | Windows RDP credential provider, Linux/Unix PAM, REST API, SSH, sudo, PowerBroker | QR code; user authentication key; third-party TOTP compatibility; API-ready integration |
| Adaptive access policies | Yes | — |
| Passwordless authentication | No | — |
| Device trust controls | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Inferse, Verilock scores higher on our published basis.