Inferse
For vendors
AdvertiseTop spots, featured rows, home sponsor Get listedAdd a product we don't cover yet Claim a listingFree: verify the domain, then correct your page Vendor dashboardNumbers, orders and placements
List your platform
Vendor dashboard

Best OpenText Application Quality Management Alternatives in 2026

Updated

20 platforms from test management software ranked against OpenText Application Quality Management on the same published basis.

  1. 1
    aqua Free plan apiextensionLinuxself-hostedWeb €19/mo7.4
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs aqua
  2. 2
    Qase Free plan apiWeb $35/mo7.3
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Qase
  3. 3
    Squash TM Free plan apiself-hostedWeb Free7.3
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Squash TM
  4. 4
    Tesbo Free plan apiself-hostedWeb $40/mo7.3
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tesbo
  5. 5
    Testiny Free plan apiself-hostedWeb $18.50/mo7.3
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Testiny
  6. 6
    Testomat.io Free plan apiextensionself-hostedWeb $2.25/mo7.3
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Testomat.io
  7. 7
    Klaros-Testmanagement Free plan AndroidapiLinuxself-hostedWeb Free7.2
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Klaros-Testmanagement
  8. 8
    KronoDesk api $195.76/mo6.8
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs KronoDesk
  9. 9
    TestMu AI AndroidapiiOSLinuxMac $17/mo6.8
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs TestMu AI
  10. 10
    PractiTest Free trial apiWeb $47/mo6.7
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs PractiTest
  11. 11
    TestMonitor Free trial AndroidapiiOSWeb $10/mo6.7
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs TestMonitor
  12. 12
    Kualitee Free plan WebWinLinuxiOSAndroid $24.33/mo5.9
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Kualitee
  13. 13
    ReadyAPI Web 5.4
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs ReadyAPI
  14. 14
    Zephyr LinuxMacWebWin 5.4
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zephyr
  15. 15
    Tricentis Testim Web 5.3
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis Testim
  16. 16
    Kiwi TCMS Web 5.2
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs Kiwi TCMS
  17. 18
    QA Sphere Web 5.2
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs QA Sphere
  18. 19
    QA Touch Web 5.2
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs QA Touch
  19. 20
    QAlity Plus 5.2
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs QAlity Plus
  20. 21
    TestBench Web 5.2
    OpenText Application Quality Management vs TestBench

OpenText Application Quality Management alternatives compared

#PlatformScoreFree planFromRuns on
1aqua7.4Free plan€19/moAPI, Browser, Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows
2Qase7.3Free plan$35/moAPI, Web
3Squash TM7.3Free planFreeAPI, self-hosted, Web
4Tesbo7.3Free plan$40/moAPI, self-hosted, Web
5Testiny7.3Free plan$18.50/moAPI, self-hosted, Web
6Testomat.io7.3Free plan$2.25/moAPI, Browser, self-hosted, Web
7Klaros-Testmanagement7.2Free planFreeAndroid, API, Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows
8KronoDesk6.8No$195.76/moAPI
9TestMu AI6.8No$17/moAndroid, API, iOS, Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Web, Windows
10PractiTest6.7No$47/moAPI, Web
11TestMonitor6.7No$10/moAndroid, API, iOS, Web
12Kualitee5.9Free plan$24.33/moWeb, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android
13ReadyAPI5.4No—Web
14Zephyr5.4No—Linux, Mac, Web, Windows
15Tricentis Testim5.3No—Web
16Kiwi TCMS5.2No—Web
18QA Sphere5.2No—Web
19QA Touch5.2No—Web
20QAlity Plus5.2No——
21TestBench5.2No—Web
Make your platform an alternative to OpenText Application Quality Management

The sponsored alternative slot on this page is labelled Sponsored.

See the price

Questions about OpenText Application Quality Management alternatives

What is the best alternative to OpenText Application Quality Management?

aqua, number 1 in test management software with a score of 7.4 out of 10. The others here: Qase, Squash TM, Tesbo and 16 more.

What is the best free alternative to OpenText Application Quality Management?

aqua is the best-ranked alternative with a free plan. 8 of the 20 alternatives here publish a free plan on their own pricing pages.

How are these alternatives ranked?

Ranked on what each maker publishes, open and connectable first: a public API, open-source code, the depth of its documentation and a free tier to try it on. Model lists are sorted by the figure in their title, exactly as each provider publishes it.