Actian Zen vs Qdrant
| Actian Zen | Qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 417 /mo | — |
| Deployment | both | both |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Index types | HNSW, flat | HNSW; sparse vector index; payload index; filterable HNSW |
| SDK languages | Python, JavaScript, C++ | Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Rust, Go, .NET, Java |
| Sparse vectors | — | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | — | 65,535 dimensions |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting. On Inferse, Qdrant scores higher on our published basis.