BCC vs Kubeshark
| BCC | Kubeshark | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | $30/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | self-hosted | self-hosted |
| Network visibility | Yes | Yes |
| Application tracing | Yes | — |
| Kernel profiling | Yes | — |
| Supported operating systems | Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, Gentoo, openSUSE, RHEL, Amazon Linux, Alpine Linux, and WSL | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Paid from | — | 30 /mo |
| Kubernetes support | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best eBPF Observability Tools. On Inferse, Kubeshark scores higher on our published basis.