Checkmarx SCA vs Grype
| Checkmarx SCA | Grype | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | Java/Maven, JavaScript/TypeScript/NPM, .NET/NuGet, Python/PIP, PHP/Composer, Swift/iOS, Go, Ruby, C/C++/Conan, Unity, Perl/CPAN, Dart/Pub | Alpine, Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, SUSE, Amazon Linux, PyPI, npm, Maven, Go modules, Composer, NuGet, Pub, RubyGems, Crates, Swift, GitHub Actions, Bitnami, Conda, WordPress plugins |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | cloud | self_hosted |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Inferse, Grype scores higher on our published basis.