Clusterfudge vs MicroShift
| Clusterfudge | MicroShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | macOS, Linux | Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Supported operating systems | macOS 12+ and Linux | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.8 |
| Graphical interface | Yes | No |
| Multi-node clusters | — | No |
| Container runtime options | — | CRI-O |
| Kubernetes version control | — | Version is tied to the MicroShift release; MicroShift 4.22 is derived from OpenShift Container Platform 4.22 |
| Local registry support | — | Yes |
| Add-on catalog | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Local Kubernetes Tools. On Inferse, Clusterfudge scores higher on our published basis.