JuiceFS vs NetApp ONTAP Select
| JuiceFS | NetApp ONTAP Select | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | — |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Paid from | 0.02 /mo | — |
| Deployment model | hybrid | on-premises |
| Storage protocols | POSIX, HDFS, S3, WebDAV | NFS, SMB/CIFS, iSCSI, NVMe over TCP, S3 |
| Replication | Yes | Yes |
| Erasure coding | No | — |
| Kubernetes support | Yes | Yes |
| S3-compatible access | Yes | Yes |
| Maximum nodes | — | 12 |
Both are listed in Best Software-Defined Storage Software. On Inferse, JuiceFS scores higher on our published basis.