Pinecone vs Zilliz Cloud
| Pinecone | Zilliz Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Web | api, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 20 /mo | — |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | Yes | Yes |
| Index types | Ananas, PQFS, IVF with PQFS | FLAT, IVF_FLAT, IVF_SQ8, IVF_PQ, HNSW, DISKANN, AUTOINDEX, SCANN, HNSW_SQ, HNSW_PQ, HNSW_PRQ, IVF_RABITQ, SPARSE_INVERTED_INDEX, SPARSE_WAND |
| SDK languages | Python, JavaScript, Java, Go, C# | Python, Java, Go, Node.js, C++ |
| Maximum dimensions | — | 32,768 dimensions |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting, Best Search Databases. On Inferse, Zilliz Cloud scores higher on our published basis.