ShardingSphere-Proxy vs TiCDC
| ShardingSphere-Proxy | TiCDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment model | self-hosted | self-hosted |
| Connection pooling | Yes | — |
| Query routing | Yes | — |
| Load balancing | Yes | — |
| Automatic failover | Yes | — |
| Supported databases | MySQL, PostgreSQL, openGauss, Firebird | — |
Both are listed in Best Database Proxy Software. On Inferse, TiCDC scores higher on our published basis.