turbopuffer vs Zilliz Cloud
| turbopuffer | Zilliz Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | $16/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | api, Web |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Paid from | 16 /mo | — |
| Deployment | both | cloud |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | Yes | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | 10,752 dimensions | 32,768 dimensions |
| Index types | SPFresh | FLAT, IVF_FLAT, IVF_SQ8, IVF_PQ, HNSW, DISKANN, AUTOINDEX, SCANN, HNSW_SQ, HNSW_PQ, HNSW_PRQ, IVF_RABITQ, SPARSE_INVERTED_INDEX, SPARSE_WAND |
| SDK languages | Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, Ruby, C#/.NET | Python, Java, Go, Node.js, C++ |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting, Best Search Databases. On Inferse, Zilliz Cloud scores higher on our published basis.