MedHub

Overview

MedHub brings student administration and curriculum work for undergraduate programs together with the scheduling and administrative needs of residency programs. The range includes curriculum mapping, evaluations, accreditation work, and reimbursement optimization, so the platform reaches beyond schedule creation. That breadth is useful when an institution wants connected education workflows; a program with a narrow scheduling need may find the scope excessive.

Key features

UME and GME workflows

Undergraduate medical education tools cover student and schedule management, reporting, curriculum mapping, competency tracking, evaluations, and accreditation maintenance. Graduate medical education adds residency and call scheduling, resident onboarding, evaluations, accreditation management, and reimbursement optimization. Rotation scheduling and conflict checks also support the scheduling workflow. This combination serves institutions that need education administration alongside operational scheduling, but is less compelling for teams that only need to publish rotas.

Curriculum, assessment, and mobile access

The curriculum and assessment solution includes board-exam readiness tools, performance analytics, and AI risk assessment. Mobile apps for iOS and Android support evaluations, work hours, calendars, procedure logs, reminders, talk-to-text, and offline task syncing. That mix suits users who need to keep routine education tasks moving away from a desktop; mobile access does not change the institutional scope of the underlying system.

Integrations and API

Interfaces and integrations include AAMC ERAS, ACGME, NPDB, NPPES, PeopleSoft, Epic, Oracle, Comet LMS, Qgenda, and Kronos. The predefined-call API gives external systems a path to MedHub data, while SAML and Shibboleth single sign-on support institutional access patterns. API access is managed through the institution’s GME office, so teams should involve that office rather than expect an individual self-service integration route. MedHub says more than half of its clients provide users with SSO.

Security, reliability, and support

MedHub states that it uses 128-bit SSL encryption, offers multifactor authentication, and complies with FERPA and SOC 2. Its security summary describes encrypted client data transfers, at least daily incremental backups, weekly full backups, and a documented continuity plan. The stated 99.95% uptime across 24/7/365 operations is relevant for institutions relying on the platform throughout the year. Support is available through institution-specific support tickets and the listed phone number, 866.766.0625, extension 1; training includes live and on-demand sessions, a Learning Portal, and strategic advisory services.

Pricing

MedHub uses a paid, custom-pricing model; institutions request pricing and can request a demo. No public seat counts, quotas, trial duration, or renewal terms are given, so buyers should obtain a proposal matched to their program scope and confirm the commercial terms before comparing costs. This sales-led approach fits institutional procurement better than teams seeking a self-serve plan with a visible monthly price.

Platforms

MedHub supports web, iOS, Android, and API access. Its Apple App Store and Google Play apps extend selected tasks to mobile, while the API enables external-system access through institution-managed permissions.

Who it's for

MedHub is best suited to medical schools and residency offices that need undergraduate curriculum and assessment capabilities alongside graduate program administration. Its integrations, SSO options, and institutional API route make it relevant where systems must fit an existing campus or health-system stack. A small team choosing only a scheduling tool should compare narrower products before taking on a platform with this wider remit.

Pros and cons

Pros

• UME and GME workflows sit in one product, spanning curriculum mapping and assessment through resident onboarding and accreditation.
• Mobile support includes offline task syncing and practical resident tasks such as work hours and procedure logs.
• Named interfaces, SAML and Shibboleth SSO, and predefined API calls provide several ways to connect with institutional systems.
• MedHub states 99.95% uptime and describes recurring backups and a continuity plan.

Cons

• Custom pricing means buyers cannot assess cost from a public plan price and must engage institutionally.
• API access is routed through the GME office, adding an approval and coordination step for integration teams.
• The wide education-management scope may be more than a team needs if its requirement is limited to schedule creation.

Alternatives

For a broader set of scheduling choices, browse Medical Residency Scheduling Software. Consider Aurora-Med if Linux, macOS, or self-hosted deployment is a priority. Amion is a paid option with a Pro plan supporting up to 10 schedules and an Enterprise plan for unlimited schedules; choose it when those schedule limits and plan distinctions better match your program. Calerity is a paid web option developed by Plum Flower Software.

TigerConnect Physician Scheduling is an enterprise-wide paid option with pricing handled through sales. CoverED offers a paid residency-program license at 30.00 USD per month, billed $25/mo annual, as well as a free trial; it may suit programs comparing a defined license price with MedHub’s custom pricing. Lightning Bolt uses per-seat licenses, with added licenses needed when the number of scheduled individuals grows. VitalScheduler offers a 9.00 USD per month plan and a free trial; its stated terms include 30 days free with no card before the paid period. CallGrid costs 125.00 USD per month, bills monthly by active resident count, and has a $25/month minimum covering up to 25 residents; it may be worth comparing when resident-count billing is a better fit.

Verdict

Choose MedHub if your institution needs a connected system for undergraduate medical education and residency administration, especially when curriculum, assessment, scheduling, and accreditation belong in the same workflow. Its breadth, mobile tasks, and integration paths are the main reasons to consider it. Look elsewhere if you need only a focused scheduling product, require an independently managed API route, or want pricing you can evaluate without a sales conversation.