Neon vs Zilliz Cloud
| Neon | Zilliz Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | $0.11/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows | api, Web |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | cloud |
| Hybrid search | — | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | — | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | — | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | — | 32,768 dimensions |
| Index types | — | FLAT, IVF_FLAT, IVF_SQ8, IVF_PQ, HNSW, DISKANN, AUTOINDEX, SCANN, HNSW_SQ, HNSW_PQ, HNSW_PRQ, IVF_RABITQ, SPARSE_INVERTED_INDEX, SPARSE_WAND |
| SDK languages | — | Python, Java, Go, Node.js, C++ |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting. On Inferse, Zilliz Cloud scores higher on our published basis.