Qdrant vs Zilliz Cloud
| Qdrant | Zilliz Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | both | cloud |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | Yes | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | 65,535 dimensions | 32,768 dimensions |
| Index types | HNSW; sparse vector index; payload index; filterable HNSW | FLAT, IVF_FLAT, IVF_SQ8, IVF_PQ, HNSW, DISKANN, AUTOINDEX, SCANN, HNSW_SQ, HNSW_PQ, HNSW_PRQ, IVF_RABITQ, SPARSE_INVERTED_INDEX, SPARSE_WAND |
| SDK languages | Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Rust, Go, .NET, Java | Python, Java, Go, Node.js, C++ |
Both are listed in Best Vector Database Hosting, Best Search Databases. On Inferse, Zilliz Cloud scores higher on our published basis.