Best CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted Alternatives in 2026
Updated
20 platforms from code signing software ranked against CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted on the same published basis.
- 1CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs SignPath
- 2CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs SignPath Foundation
- 3CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs SignServer
- 4CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs AWS Signer
- 5CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs Sigstore
- 6CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs DigiCert Software Trust Manager
- 7CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs SSL.com Certificate Lifecycle Management
- 8CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs Bamboo Deploy
- 9CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs ComSignTrust Secure Code Signing Platform (ASCS)
- 10CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs Keyfactor Platform
- 11CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs Signo
- 12CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs LAAVAT PKI and Signing Platform
- 13CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs Cosign
- 14CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer
- 15CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs Code Signing Key Management Server (CSKMS)
- 16CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs GoGetSSL Cloud Code Signing
- 17CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs The Update Framework
- 18CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs Aujas Automated Code Signing Platform
- 19CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs CodeLocker
- 20CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs GaraTrust
CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted alternatives compared
| # | Platform | Score | Free plan | From | Runs on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SignPath | 7.3 | Free plan | Free | API, Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| 2 | SignPath Foundation | 7.3 | Free plan | Free | API, Web |
| 3 | SignServer | 7.3 | Free plan | Free | API, Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| 4 | AWS Signer | 7.2 | Free plan | Free | API, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| 5 | Sigstore | 7.2 | Free plan | Free | API, Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Windows |
| 6 | DigiCert Software Trust Manager | 7.0 | No | — | API, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| 7 | SSL.com Certificate Lifecycle Management | 7.0 | No | — | API, Web |
| 8 | Bamboo Deploy | 6.9 | No | $15/mo | API, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| 9 | ComSignTrust Secure Code Signing Platform (ASCS) | 6.9 | No | — | API, Web |
| 10 | Keyfactor Platform | 6.9 | No | — | API, self-hosted, Web |
| 11 | Signo | 6.8 | No | — | API, Linux, self-hosted |
| 12 | LAAVAT PKI and Signing Platform | 6.7 | No | — | API, self-hosted, Web |
| 13 | Cosign | 6.0 | Free plan | Free | Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Windows |
| 14 | Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer | 5.5 | No | — | Linux, Mac, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| 15 | Code Signing Key Management Server (CSKMS) | 5.4 | No | — | self-hosted |
| 16 | GoGetSSL Cloud Code Signing | 5.3 | No | $35.42/mo | Mac, Web, Windows |
| 17 | The Update Framework | 5.2 | No | — | — |
| 18 | Aujas Automated Code Signing Platform | 5.1 | No | — | Web |
| 19 | CodeLocker | 5.1 | No | — | — |
| 20 | GaraTrust | 5.1 | No | — | — |
Make your platform an alternative to CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted
See the priceThe sponsored alternative slot on this page is labelled Sponsored.
Questions about CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted alternatives
What is the best alternative to CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted?
SignPath, number 1 in code signing software with a score of 7.3 out of 10. The others here: SignPath Foundation, SignServer, AWS Signer and 16 more.
What is the best free alternative to CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted?
SignPath is the best-ranked alternative with a free plan. 6 of the 20 alternatives here publish a free plan on their own pricing pages.
How are these alternatives ranked?
Ranked on what each maker publishes, open and connectable first: a public API, open-source code, the depth of its documentation and a free tier to try it on. Model lists are sorted by the figure in their title, exactly as each provider publishes it.
























